位置:首页 >工程技术 >交通运输科学与技术 >EUROPEAN TRANSPORT RESEARCH REVIEW >The variability of urban safety performance functions for different road elements: an Italian case study

不同道路要素的城市安全性能函数的可变性:意大利案例研究

The variability of urban safety performance functions for different road elements: an Italian case study

作者:Paolo Intini;Nicola Berloco;Gabriele Cavalluzzi;Dominique Lord;Vittorio Ranieri;Pasquale Colonna;

关键词:Safety performance functions,Injury crash,Urban segments,Urban intersections

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-021-00490-6

发表时间:2021年

  • 文献详情
  • 相似文献

摘要

背景城市安全性能函数用于预测碰撞频率,主要基于负二项式 (NB) 计数模型。可以对它们进行区分,以考虑路段/交叉口的同质子集和不同的预测变量。材料和方法主要研究问题涉及:a)通过讨论安全建模找到路段和交叉口的最佳可能子集相关问题并调查子集中预测变量的可变性; b) 将建模结果与现有文献进行比较,以突出共同趋势和/或主要差异; c) 除传统变量外,评估额外碰撞预测因素的重要性。在一个国家研究项目的背景下,收集了意大利巴里市路段和交叉口的交通量、几何形状、控制和附加变量,该市发生了 1500 起死亡+伤害相关的碰撞事故(2012 年至 2016 年)。开发了六种 NB 模型:单向/双向同质路段、三路/四路、有信号/无信号交叉口。结果碰撞预测因子在考虑的不同子集中存在很大差异。特别讨论了垂直标志对次要道路/车道、临界视距、自行车道、人行道/标记维护的影响。通过将结果与文献进行比较,发现了一些共同的趋势,但也发现了碰撞预测变量的类型和效果的差异。结论通过考虑路段和交叉口的不同子集来分解城市碰撞预测模型有助于揭示具体的碰撞预测模型。一些预测因素的影响。当地特征可能会影响既定的碰撞预测因素与碰撞频率之间的关系。城市碰撞频率变异的很大一部分仍然无法解释,因此鼓励对此主题的研究。


Abstract

BackgroundUrban safety performance functions are used to predict crash frequencies, mostly based on Negative Binomial (NB) count models. They could be differentiated for considering homogeneous subsets of segments/intersections and different predictors.Materials and methodsThe main research questions concerned: a) finding the best possible subsets for segments and intersections for safety modelling, by discussing the related problems and inquiring into the variability of predictors within the subsets; b) comparing the modelling results with the existing literature to highlight common trends and/or main differences; c) assessing the importance of additional crash predictors, besides traditional variables. In the context of a National research project, traffic volumes, geometric, control and additional variables were collected for road segments and intersections in the City of Bari, Italy, with 1500 fatal+injury related crashes (2012–2016). Six NB models were developed for: one/two-way homogeneous segments, three/four-legged, signalized/unsignalized intersections.ResultsCrash predictors greatly vary within the different subsets considered. The effect of vertical signs on minor roads/driveways, critical sight distance, cycle crossings, pavement/markings maintenance was specifically discussed. Some common trends but also differences in both types and effect of crash predictors were found by comparing results with literature.ConclusionThe disaggregation of urban crash prediction models by considering different subsets of segments and intersections helps in revealing the specific influence of some predictors. Local characteristics may influence the relationships between well-established crash predictors and crash frequencies. A significant part of the urban crash frequency variability remains unexplained, thus encouraging research on this topic.