位置:首页 >工程技术 >交通运输科学与技术 >EUROPEAN TRANSPORT RESEARCH REVIEW >Financing urban transportation infrastructure in a multi-actors environment: the role of value capture

在多方参与的环境中为城市交通基础设施提供融资:价值获取的作用

Financing urban transportation infrastructure in a multi-actors environment: the role of value capture

作者:Anastasia Roukouni;Cathy Macharis;Socrates Basbas;Basil Stephanis;George Mintsis;

关键词:Value capture finance,Urban public transport infrastructure planning,Multi-actor multi-criteria analysis

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-017-0281-5

发表时间:2018年

  • 文献详情
  • 相似文献

摘要

目的一系列以提高可达性带来的价值增值为基础的城市公共交通创新金融机制和工具,作为应对公共财政资源萎缩带来的挑战的解决方案,最近受到广泛欢迎:价值捕获金融( VCF)。所应用的运输融资政策的有效性在很大程度上取决于利益相关者之间的一致程度,这使得合作成为成功的先决条件。本文提出的研究评估了基于 VCF 概念的城市公共交通的替代融资方案。方法使用了 Macharis [1] 开发的多参与者多标准分析 (MAMCA)。该方法在其领域是独一无二的,因为它包括所有相关利益相关者的深入参与并揭示了他们的思维方式。结果所提出的方法框架应用于以下实际案例研究希腊塞萨洛尼基的地铁系统建设。测试了三种不同的融资方案,并通过对属于六个不同群体的 70 名利益相关者进行个人访谈来得出标准权重,这些利益相关者分别是:政府/地方政府、交通当局、大学/研究机构、私营部门、社会和专业协会。利益相关者群体之间出现了值得注意的相似之处,但也出现了矛盾,突出表现在每个群体使用的不同标准。结论本文介绍了 MAMCA 作为城市交通基础设施不同 VCF 机制的事前评估方法。 MAMCA 成为此评估的一种强大方法,因为它被证明能够处理 VCF 的复杂性和多学科性质。


Abstract

PurposeA family of innovative financial mechanisms and tools for urban public transport, based on the value increment caused by enhanced accessibility, are lately gaining much popularity as a solution to the challenges posed by public financial resources’ shrinkage: Value Capture Finance (VCF). The effectiveness of applied transport financing policies depends significantly on the level of agreement among stakeholders, making collaboration a prerequisite for success. The research presented herein assesses alternative financing options for urban public transportation which are based on the VCF concept.MethodThe Multi - Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis (MAMCA) developed by Macharis [1] is used. The methodology is unique in its field, as it includes in-depth involvement of all relevant stakeholders and reveals their way of thinking.ResultsThe proposed methodological framework is applied to the real-world case study of the under construction metro system of Thessaloniki, Greece. Three different financing scenarios are tested, and the criteria weight elicitation is performed through personal interviews with 70 stakeholders belonging to six different groups, namely: Government/Local Authorities, Transport Authorities, Universities/Research Institutions, Private Sector, Society and Professional Associations. Noteworthy similarities but also contradictions among stakeholder groups emerged, highlighted by the different criteria used for each group.ConclusionThe paper introduces the MAMCA as an ex - ante evaluation method for different VCF mechanisms for urban transportation infrastructure. MAMCA emerges as a robust methodology for this assessment, as it is proved to be capable of dealing with the VCF complexity and multidisciplinary nature.